I suppose this is long overdue, but considering eligibility questions in another thread, lets as a class see if its all about nothing or actually an issue. With the Australian Superkart Championships looming, are we actually going to have ten competitors to constitute a class, or are we all just kidding ourselves again. Below is a list of questions to find out of those that are on here, 250 National drivers only that are intending to run this year in some way shape or form, who is doing what and do you at all care about the influx of 'non-motocross' based engines.
1. Do you intend to compete at Sydney Motorsports Park Rd 1?
2. Do You intend to compete at Phillip Island Rd 2?
3. Are you interested in local club meetings only?
4. Do you have a problem with the introduction of specialty built engines such as the Wiwa GasGas?
5. Would you race against competitors with these engines?
6. Do you think the Wiwa GasGas and possible future specialty (non-motocross) engines should be scored in different class?
7. Would you be happy to use a 'control' tyre if it was offered to competitors at a set discounted price?
8. Do you think 250 National competitor imput should be used to formulate rules in Australia or would you prefer to abide by CIK/Uk rules?
9. What do you feel is required to gain/keep competitors in the 250 National class?
10. Further Comment:
I'm not sure how many of our class drivers are site members on here but if you know of any other competitors who are planning to race this year there imput would be greatly appreciated. I would like to approach some sponsors to help this class in the future so knowing the REAL number of committed drivers would help.
And please this thread is for 250 National Competitors ONLY!!
Comments35
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
1. Do you intend to compete at Sydney Motorsports Park Rd 1?
Yes
2. Do You intend to compete at Phillip Island Rd 2?
Yes
3. Are you interested in local club meetings only?
No
4. Do you have a problem with the introduction of specialty built engines such as the Wiwa GasGas?
There is always development going on in this sport, it is just unfortunate in this case that the perceived improvement is so large. I'm sure they are great if you have one...
5. Would you race against competitors with these engines?
Yes. A GasGas is yet to win at a national level.
6. Do you think the Wiwa GasGas and possible future specialty (non-motocross) engines should be scored in different class?
Potentially, but then we just end up with 2 smaller classes which doesn't really get us anywhere. In the long term the dominate engine will take over.
7. Would you be happy to use a 'control' tyre if it was offered to competitors at a set discounted price?
If there was significant cost saving.
8. Do you think 250 National competitor imput should be used to formulate rules in Australia or would you prefer to abide by CIK/Uk rules?
I think a combination of CIK rules with Australian competitor input is the most sensible approach.
9. What do you feel is required to gain/keep competitors in the 250 National class?
250 National Competitors tend to be budget racers, so cost is the ultimate driver for whether they race or not. Keeping cost under control would help.
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
1. Do you intend to compete at Sydney Motorsports Park Rd 1?
If I win tattslotto and can run as a p- plater
2. Do You intend to compete at Phillip Island Rd 2?
If I win Powerball ( should be off my P's by then)
3. Are you interested in local club meetings only?
No but thats what my budget allows for
4. Do you have a problem with the introduction of specialty built engines such as the Wiwa GasGas?
Yes - it should stay as a motorcross style engine with over the counter parts available
5. Would you race against competitors with these engines?
Yes
6. Do you think the Wiwa GasGas and possible future specialty (non-motocross) engines should be scored in different class?
I think my answer to 4 means yes , but at the end of the day to finish first , first you must finish.
7. Would you be happy to use a 'control' tyre if it was offered to competitors at a set discounted price?
Yes - I think a control tyre and limiting to a set per day would make it more affordable and bring the field together a bit.
8. Do you think 250 National competitor imput should be used to formulate rules in
Australia or would you prefer to abide by CIK/Uk rules?
I think a combination of CIK rules with Australian competitor input is the most sensible approach CIK for safety and some Aussie rules to make the racing affordable and fun.
9. What do you feel is required to gain/keep competitors in the 250 National class?
Im on a tight budget, so cost is the ultimate driver for me. Keeping cost under control would help. A heavier weight ???? maybe I should hit the gym.
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
1. Do you intend to compete at Sydney Motorsports Park Rd 1?
- 80% Yes, depending on budget
2. Do You intend to compete at Phillip Island Rd 2?
-Yes
3. Are you interested in local club meetings only?
-Local plus the odd race in SA/NSW
4. Do you have a problem with the introduction of specialty built engines such as the Wiwa GasGas?
-Only if it is far superior to existing competitors (2-3 secs a lap)
5. Would you race against competitors with these engines?
-If i am competitive against them
6. Do you think the Wiwa GasGas and possible future specialty (non-motocross) engines should be scored in different class?
- Possilbly a 'phase in' period, where competitiveness against existing mx based engines can be gauged
7. Would you be happy to use a 'control' tyre if it was offered to competitors at a set discounted price?
- If price was good and quantities limited per major event
8. Do you think 250 National competitor imput should be used to formulate rules in Australia or would you prefer to abide by CIK/Uk rules?
-A mixture of both, weights to go up to CIK!!
9. What do you feel is required to gain/keep competitors in the 250 National class?
-Better communication between competitors, possible 'Drivers Association', control parts/consumables to bmake racing more cost effective as drivers in this class seem to run to a 'budget'. Competitor consultation re rules/engines so no as to diadvantage those existing competitors nin the class.
10. Further Comment:
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
1. Do you intend to compete at Sydney Motorsports Park Rd 1?
- No (don't have a CAMS licence)
2. Do You intend to compete at Phillip Island Rd 2?
- No
3. Are you interested in local club meetings only?
- At this point yes
4. Do you have a problem with the introduction of specialty built engines such as the Wiwa GasGas?
- No
5. Would you race against competitors with these engines?
- yes
6. Do you think the Wiwa GasGas and possible future specialty (non-motocross) engines should be scored in different class?
- Not unless they're that much faster than the Mx style engines.
7. Would you be happy to use a 'control' tyre if it was offered to competitors at a set discounted price?
- If price was good and quantities limited per major event
8. Do you think 250 National competitor imput should be used to formulate rules in Australia or would you prefer to abide by CIK/Uk rules?
- A little from from both, it doesn't make sense to be different to the rest of the world for no reason but the rules should still be tailored to local conditions where necessary
9. What do you feel is required to gain/keep competitors in the 250 National class?
- Solid rules and no political bulls*&t from people not racing in the class. Keeping costs under control without stopping development (double edged sword i know).
10. Further Comment:
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
as for weights, nah! disagree, when i play basketball with my mates they don't lower the net for me, when i play footy with my mates they don't go and lose 40 kgs so they weigh as much as me and when we go to the hire kart track they don't make me add more weight so they can keep up with me although they all use the excuse "well your more suited to this sport than we are ;)"...i never whing about the net nor do i whing about how big they are,...i just get on with the game!...needless to say, i don't play any of these sports on the weekend in a team..... now why would that be?? ;D
[/quote]
Dalton are you serious ??? I thought you would want to back your talent and beat other drivers by being a better driver and setting up your kart better than the other guy. In all the other sports you mentioned there is no way to make things fair for all, in motor racing there is. Would you really want to rely on the fact that you weight heaps less than the next bloke to win or would you prefer to win with driving skill, I know what would be more satisfying.
Sorry to jump into your thread guys.
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
All I was saying was that i think if karts are weighed up to make it realistic for the average bloke to go racing then thats what i think is fair. If someone like you needs to put some weight on the kart to come up to weight so be it. To me it looked like you were saying you should be able to take advantage of weighting as much as Kate Moss.
I don't have a problem making weight in my class but if they wanted to bring the weights up by five or ten to make it fair for guys like Brett Purdie to compete against me on a level playing field i wouldn't give a shit
As for the auto lift, mate thats up to you.
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
If you weigh more than 15kgs over the min weight in 250cc, then just enjoy the sport for what it is.
Direct drive karts without a gearbox and/or low power karts such as 125cc and below.....yes there is some advantage to be had and those class weights are fair for the fat and not so fat Joe's in this world....... and no offence to any Joe's who may be fat or skinny. ;D
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
#2. Go to PI only if good results at EC.
#3. May do National Champ. and local club races with both karts.
#4. No politics, depends on their results.
#5. Have done races with Gas Gas that have speed, so yes.
#6. Until shown they are consistantly faster, run in same National class.
#7. I have no problem with a control tyre.
#8. Local Nationals should have a say, but not into politics.
#9. You could try a Nat. competitors association, but that may not help. Seems the Nat. class rules need amending
#10. Only comment is for all states National competitors to just get on with racing, no politics, I mean no arguments between states.
Try all national karts including Gas Gas racing together until proven their speed is consistantly faster, as there are some CR250's including at least one Qld. kart that wins races against the Gas Gas.
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
so far........with Frank Giglio we have a Championship :).
1.Dalton @ both rounds
2.Bernie @ both rounds
3.Spiderwebb at the first round maybe the second
4.Raceroz @ 80% of running
5.Frank Giglio @ both rounds...well done Frank.
[/quote]
Dalton,
Do you know if it has been confirmed yet from AMRC that a min of 5 to make a class? I know SKA submitted it for the sporting regs but haven't heard if this has been accepted.
Also, have the "P" plates being allowed by CAMS?
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
2. As above, and working out of town.(but maybe able to get there anyways)
3. Maybe.
4. No.
5. Yes and have done at a few events.
6. While ever the 250 nat class cant get 10 numbers for our premier events, then yes.
7. I am with Dalton on this one we already have controlled classes.
8. Little from both lets just get it sorted out......................
9. Solid rules and no political bulls*&t (well said TimW).
10.
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
It was to be my last nationals race meeting, the only chance for me to drive my #17 .Anderson/Viper in the nationals, since I didn't enter last year.
I have retired from race driving, except maybe only do a practice run.
Whilst I still have the karts (For Sale) Paul will drive my #17 and Justin the #37 PFP Raider.
So I will play the game of Team Principal, stuck in the pits worrying how the racing is going.
Since it's retirement time due to health issues, I may get time to do some fishing for a change ::) ::) ::)
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
43 Matthew Stockman (NSW) [/quote]
There's that number again. ;D
He did a very good job also considering he is not the leanest cow in the paddock.......(for those in 250's that complain they can't be competitive because they are too heavy over the scales)
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
;D ;D ;D ;D
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
So Dalton you are saying if you are 15kgs or more overweight you cant win anyway so just have a good time but you wont win mmmmm so you are saying weight makes a difference to performance - yes - even in a twin.
[/quote]
Mike,
Don't worry about what anybody says, just shut up and listen to me. :D
What will it take for the doubters to understand........how many examples......nah I'm wasting my breath it will never sink in.
Even with a Stock Honda at 37HP on a tight undulating circuit, Greg Bass did a 1:07.2 at Wakefield Pk on the weekend with old tyres on his kart's first outing, without offense his weight is very much so into 3 figures, probably off the meter on most bathroom scales with only 37HP!
What about Gavin Bennett, 3 times European Superkart Champion, not exactly a supermodel figure.
If your ambitions out weigh your talent, stop blaming the rule book, it won't help you. If your opposition is faster than you, it's always going to be the case unless YOU change something to make yourself faster.
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
It will hopefully entice more people to the 250 National class due to a larger range of engines plus the ones we already have. To think the Gas Gas, Yamaha, Honda and KTM we already have taking on the THR, Vipers and DEA etc will be great to see. Also give a chance for 250 Inter guys who cant afford to upgrade to the latest inline engines a chance to buy a new engine and challenge for race wins again.
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
We only needed a sentence taken out or changed to suit, surely it can't be that hard to make at three or four twins legal again without us having to spend more money.
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
That was also discussed and will be sorted. It is an easy fix but for some reason it just seems to take sooooooooo dam long.
Cheers,
Brett
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Well I have been told its all going to be taken care of and the engines should be good to go again next season. Once again our sport seems to be able to make the very simple seem very hard.
[/quote]
Well said Jase
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
Im all for the new engines, thought you'd be happy you got the Gas Gas through. Interestingly enough speaking to competitors in the UK, many are now jumping ship to the 125cc class. Why you ask? Because apart from Viper and THR running 'development' parts, nobody has run full blown engines as yet. This year in the UK was supposed to see all these engines run alongside the existing ones, to give competitors a gauge as to their competitiveness. But alas the DEA and others have not been seen.
How about we hold off making these engines elligible from 2015 onwards. Give the manufactures time to sort out and make reliable so when they get 'downunder' its not just a dumping ground. Also with a years running secondhand equipment will be more affordable. The class here is just getting back on its feet here with some good racing at the PI national round, lets not stuff it up. I'm still to see the rumoured 10-15 compete in Qld, but the numbers here in Vic and Pelli's KTM brigade in NSW are testimont to a proven current formula.
Either that or make it a run what you brung open class, im all for that also considering the magnesium cased 6-speed factory YZ Colin Edwards can get his hands on for me!
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
The other thing is that CAMS technical rule writers do not like the use of CIK 'past or present' so be prepared to have this rejected even though the NSA are happy with it. This happened less than 6 months ago with Stock Honda regs.
Re: 250 National 2013 Survey
[quote author=Raceroz link=topic=1963.msg24656#msg24656 date=1384994967]
Interestingly enough speaking to competitors in the UK, many are now jumping ship to the 125cc class.
[/quote]
Many????? Out of the 68 x 2013 British F250 National Long Circuit drivers, name say 3 who are moving from F250 Nat to F125 and of those how many because of the new F250 National Regs?
As it stands, I can think of 1 (Josh Rayman) who is making that change, purely because he couldn't get his 2001 Honda CR250 to stay in one piece, and the possibility of another (Sam Moss) who will race in the class that's calendar fits best with his work schedule (will have to work every other weekend). He may well race in both as availability dictates.
I happen to agree with many of your points, but it's very easy to take "Facebook banter" and the like as "kosher" and presenting it as fact or "to your personal knowledge". In doing this you could mislead Aus competitors.
Whatever course the Aus 250 National class takes, Viper Racing UK is haply to supply relevant kit and our development of the Honda is on-going hand-in-hand with the EVO.
If anyone wants to purchase an ex-team Viper 2013 F250 Nat Honda CR250 motor package, I have 2 left (2 already sold), then they can contact me. They are both 2013 MSA British Championship race winners. Of course you can buy new Honda CR250 as well!!
We are registering 2 x EVO kits with the MSA. 1 is the Viper SK250S crank and cylinder assembly (68 x 68.8 bore and stroke) to fit the Honda crankcase induction engine and the other is the SK250S full kit engine with front mounted induction and rear exit exhaust.
Registration paperwork must be submitted to the MSA by 1st December and inspections carried out by 31st Jan 2014.
As an aside, the UK F125 Open class is up from 4 or 5 competitors 3 years ago up to a forecast 30+ in 2014, mainly due to the efforts of a few in getting behind the class and getting the regs right to allow kit that was sitting under people's benches unused (like the TMKV95) to compete on an equal footing with the likes of the Vortex (The class Champion was 2012 European Div 1 Champion, Lee Harpham driving an F1 chassis with a TM KV95 engine). The class is made up of a selection of new, existing and returnee drivers and great news for the UK superkarting scene.
Best Regards
Ian :)